I always thought those two had different hair textures. (Doesn't darkened shoe-polish hair mean it's Faul?)Here you can see the Paul on the left has a lower left eye. And the Paul on the right has eyes that are much more level.
Image on left from HDN album, image on right from vintage mag: http://jojoplace.org/Shoebox/James_Paul_McCartney.org/thumbaa.jpg
Notice how the left eyes and left eyebrow don't line up (he could be raising the eyebrow). Everything else is spot on.
Except the Paul on the right also doesn't seem to have the crows-feet. But it could be the photo is too washed out. (Some Pauls have them, some don't).
Photo on left from AHDN album cover.
The 'forensic scientists' say the jawlines of these two Pauls match, but did they notice the glaringly different eyebrows?
Are those even the same noses, mouths, ears and chin clefts? And why did they use such a poorly lit photo for their 'sceintific' research?
Sure, the Wired article does an alright job of showing us that there were TWO Pauls, but that is just one small part of a much bigger picture. I would like to see them analyze several photos from the Beatlemania era, comparing them all with each other. And likewise with post-66 photos.
I'd also like to see them explain the uncanny resemblances between them all.
Here's a Paul from 1964 that matches one of the Pauls in the Sgt. Pepper photo shoot pretty well.
^These two guys are strikingly similar, imo. Though the left eye doesn't wander quite as much with the younger one.
It seems these two may be the same person, but the left eye is a little unfocused, the left nostril is higher, the bottom lip dips to the left, front teeth angle to the right and the left chin muscle pulls more. Things you probably couldn't get with surgery. Looks like same chin scars/dimples, too. It's a perfect match, except for maybe the eyebrows and cheeks? Please, Please pass the Pepper!
Pretty dang close. Different chins and eyebrows. Some might cry "doctored", but if they're gonna doctor these photos why not make them 100% similar. These 98% similar comps only show that there were multiples.
Even the same bulbous cranium. And again; notice the wandering left eye, higher left nostril, lower lip dipping to the left, front teeth angled right etc. If this isn't the same person it's a clone. Surgery can't do all that for every look-alike/stand-in.
These Pauls are 98% similar. I did eye angle comparisons. Why not 100%? Created via a technology the public is unaware of?
I compared all of their eye angles to Pepper Paul. I will hold off posting all the comps for space's sake.
But I will post the ones that line up every time... This guy.
^the only difference between these guys are slight variations in the eye brows. Even the vibe/demeanor is practically the same. These comps ring clear.
Some people say the image of Paul in the Sgt. Pepper cover is a composite. if so, why did they part his hair on the right instead of the left? And why would they need to put the mustache on? And you'd think they'd fix that wandering eye.
these eye angles don't match
But these eye angles do match.
vintage scans: http://jojoplace.org/Shoebox/James_Paul_McCartney.org/beautifulPaul2.jpg
These two have the same size head. And see how well everything else lines up?
as seen on the front of the old PID/MH forum to Illustrate the "glaring differences between Paul and Faul". (which has been set to private)
Strikingly similar, except for the left eye.
But here the eyes line up perfectly. Same head size, too.
Notice how all of the Pauls in these comps are about 98% similar. I've noticed you can take any two photos any P/Fauls from any era, and they will match up about 98% similar. Which is both the problem and the solution to this whole thing.
Whatever is going on, they are too close to be look-alikes and too different to be the same guy.
Created via a technology that the unknown to the public?